Article Sidebar

Volume 21 Issue 2, December 2023
Submitted
October 15, 2023
Published
January 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 268 Download : 180

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Does political dynasty affect local spending in Indonesia?  Only a few articles have taken up the political economy issues in Indonesia This study provides empirical analysis that focuses on explaining the effect of the political competition through dynasty winning in the mayoral election to the local spending that focuses on functional-classified expenditure at the district level. Using the Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) estimation, this study examines whether the dynasty mayor has different trends in the way to spend local expenditure compared to the non-dynasty mayors. Due to the limited political competition, this study finds the magnitude effect of the dynasty mayor on local spending that used to drive the regional economy. Compared to the non-dynasty mayors on a separate sub-dataset, this study finds different effects of a dynasty between the incumbent and the non-incumbent dynasty mayor on local spending. The incumbent dynasty mayor negatively affects ‘visible’ expenditure’ e.g., grant and social assistance expenditure, social protection expenditure, housing and public amenities expenditure, education expenditure, dan current expenditure. This study also finds negative effects of the political dynasty on local spending from the dynasty mayor elected during the period of simultaneous mayoral election (2015-2018).

Keywords

political dynasty local spending mayoral election Regression Discontinuity Design

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

How to Cite
Larasati, D. P., & Rezki, J. F. (2024). Political Dynasties and Local Spending in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 21(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v21i2.22768
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, A. (2016). Do political dynasties hinder development? Evidence from a natural disaster. Working Paper, (S-89207-PAK-1). International Growth Center, December. https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Ali-2016-Working-paper.pdf
  2. Aspinall, E., & As’ ad, M. U. (2016). Understanding family politics: Successes and failures of political dynasties in regional Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 24(3), 420-435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26372044
  3. Besley, T., Persson, T., & Sturm, D. M. (2010). Political competition, policy and growth: Theory and evidence from the US. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00606.x
  4. Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2020). A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2018). Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity. Stata Journal, 18(1), 234–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1801800115
  6. Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2020). Simple local polynomial density estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1449-1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1635480
  7. Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2022). lpdensity: Local Polynomial Density Estimation and Inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 101(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v101.i02
  8. Cruz, C., Labonne, J., & Querubín, P. (2020). Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from the Philippines. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000789
  9. Dulay, D., & Go, L. (2021). When Running for Office Runs in the Family: Horizontal Dynasties, Policy, and Development in the Philippines. Comparative Political Studies, 55(4), 588-627 https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024292
  10. Fadhillah, D. N., Ramadhan, F., & Dewa, T. T. (2020). Riset Nagara Institute: Dinasti Politik Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020. Nagara Institute.
  11. Fitriyah, F. (2020). Partai Politik, Rekrutmen Politik dan Pembentukan Dinasti Politik pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada). Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.1.2020.1-17
  12. Garces, L., Jandoc, K., & Lu, M. G. (2021). Political Dynasties and Economic Development: Evidence using Nighttime Light in the Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, 41(3), 215-261. https://doi.org/10.1163/2165025X-BJA10010
  13. George, S. E., & Ponattu, D. (2018). How Do Political Dynasties Affect Economic Development? Theory and Evidence from India. The World Bank.
  14. Guritno, D. C., Samudro, B. R., & Soesilo, A. M. (2018). Does Political Dynasty Cause Poverty?. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 11(2), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16062.
  15. Kenawas, Y. C. (2023). The irony of Indonesia’s democracy: The rise of dynastic politics in the post-Suharto era. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(3), 748 764. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231195970
  16. Lewis, B. D. (2020). How do mayors get elected? The causal effects of pre-electoral coalitions on mayoral election outcomes in Indonesia. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1627334
  17. Lewis, B. D., & Hendrawan, A. (2019). The impact of majority coalitions on local government spending, service delivery, and corruption in Indonesia. European Journal of Political Economy, 58, 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.11.002
  18. Lewis, B. D., Nguyen, H. T., & Hendrawan, A. (2020). Political accountability and public service delivery in decentralized Indonesia: Incumbency advantage and the performance of second term mayors. European Journal of Political Economy, 64, 101910. htps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101910
  19. Liddle, R. W., Mujani, S., & Irvani, D. (2022). Support for Family Politics and Democracy: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 3(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.15408/jisi.v3i2.29670
  20. Maličká, L. (2019). Political Expenditure Cycle at The Municipal Government Level in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(2), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.11118/Actaun201967020503
  21. Rehman, F. U., Ahmad, N., & Nasir, M. (2022). Political Dynasties and Local Economic Development in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 61(3), 415-443. https://doi.org/10.30541/v61i3pp.415-444
  22. Rezki, J. F. (2022). Political Competition and Local Government Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Economic of Government, 23(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00272-3
  23. Rowley, C. K. (1997). Donald Wittman’s “The Myth of Democratic Failure” [Review of The Myth of Democratic Failure, by D. Wittman]. Public Choice, 92(1/2), 15–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30024239
  24. Rusnaedy, Z., Fatma, F., & Haris, A. (2021). Political Dynasty and Single Candidate in Indonesian Local Elections: Where Are The Parties?. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 3(2), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v3i2.297
  25. Sari, V. K., & Prastyani, D. (2021). The Impact of the Institution on Economic Growth: An Evidence from ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v19i1.12793
  26. Setyaningrum, D., & Saragih, H. A. (2019). Political dynasties and the moderating role of good public governance. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(2), 135-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v8i2.11636.
  27. Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120(2), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007
  28. Skoufias, E., Narayan, A., Dasgupta, B., & Kaiser, K. (2014). Electoral Accountability and Local Government Spending in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6782). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6782
  29. Solihah, R. (2016). Politik Transaksional dalam Pilkada Serentak dan Implikasinya bagi Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 2(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.31947/politics.v2i1.1659
  30. Susanti, M. H. (2017). Dinasti Politik dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(2), 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440
  31. Tusalem, R. F., & Pe‐Aguirre, J. J. (2013). The Effect of Political Dynasties on Effective Democratic Governance: Evidence From the P hilippines. Asian Politics & Policy, 5(3), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12037
  32. Yadav, V. (2020). Political families and support for democracy in Pakistan. Asian Survey, 60(6), 1044-1071. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2020.60.6.1044

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.