Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the underexplored relationship between religiosity and household energy consumption, applying religious behavior theory to energy economics in Indonesia—the world’s largest Muslim-majority nation. While traditional models focus on socioeconomic determinants, this paper investigates how Islamic values influence electricity consumption, explicitly addressing the inherent endogeneity of self-reported religiosity. Utilizing data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS-5) comprising 21,023 Muslim households, we employ a two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable approach, proxying religiosity through ritual frequency and religious practices to overcome omitted variable and self-selection biases. The empirical results reveal a robust, statistically significant negative relationship between higher levels of religiosity and household electricity expenditure. This finding aligns with the theoretical framework that religious tenets foster moderation, self-control, and environmental stewardship. The results remain resilient across extensive sensitivity analyses and alternative model specifications. Culturally, these findings imply that faith-based institutions and religious leaders are powerful, cost-effective conduits for behavioral energy conservation. Integrating moral paradigms into national climate strategies offers a potent, localized mechanism to complement standard efficiency policies and accelerate carbon emission reductions in emerging Muslim-majority economies.

Keywords

Religiosity Energy Consumption Electricity Expenditure IFLS Muslim Household

Article Details

How to Cite
Tameema, A. C., Hartono, D., & Misdawita. (2026). Religiosity and Its Impact on Energy Consumption in Indonesian Muslim Households. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v24i1.23368

References

  1. Ampofo, A., & Mabefam, M. G. (2021). Religiosity and Energy Poverty: Empirical Evidence Across Countries. Energy Economics, 102, 105463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105463
  2. Anwar, M. (2025). Investigating the Influence of Islamic Values, Environmental knowledge and Environmental Concerns on Attitudes and Electric Vehicle Adoption Intentions. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-09-2024-0300
  3. Arli, D., Pentecost, R. D., & Thaichon, P. (2021). Does Religion make Consumers more Environmentally Friendly? Marketing Intellegence & Planning, 39(8), 1024-1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2020-0404
  4. Aslam, A., & Ahmad, E. (2023). Untangling Electricity Demand Elasticities: Insights from Heterogeneous Household Groups in Pakistan. Energy, 282, 128827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128827
  5. Azzi, C., & Ehrenberg, R. (1975). Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance. Journal of Political Economy, 83(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1086/260305
  6. ClientEarth Communications. (2024, January 24). Our Groundbreaking Case Against Shell’s Board of Directors Comes to an End. ClientEarth. https://www.clientearth.org/latest/news/we-re-taking-legal-action-against-shell-s-board-for-mismanaging-climate-risk/
  7. Dong, J., Ren, Y., & Glauben, T. (2024). Gospel or Curse: The Impact of Religious Beliefs on Energy Poverty in Rural China. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11, 641. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03119-w
  8. Dong, Y., Coleman, M., & Miller, S. A. (2021). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Service Expansion in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-034103
  9. Durbin, J. (1954). Errors in Variables. Revue de l'Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22(1/3), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1401917
  10. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Education Publisher.
  11. Halim, M. A., & Rahman, M. M. (2022). The Effect of Taxation on Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Heliyon, 8(9), e10512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10512
  12. Harrell, G. D. (1986). Consumer Behavior. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  13. Hassan, M., Mahmood, Z., & Khakwani, I. (2025). Impact of Religiosity on Pakistani Youth Green Purchase Intensions and Behavior: Extending Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2023-0095
  14. Huang, W.-H. (2015). The Determinants of Household Electricity Consumption in Taiwan: Evidence from Quantile Regression. Energy, 87, 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.101
  15. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465-1495. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564806
  16. International Energy Agency. (2024). World Energy Outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
  17. Kermani, B. M. M., Mirzaei, H., Kolahi, M., & Kermani, M. (2023). Sociological Explanation of Factors Affecting Households Energy Consumption in Iran [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3037528/v1
  18. Kwakwa, P. A., Alhassan, H., Aboagye, S., & Asale, M. A. (2024). Electricity Conservation intention among university Students in Northern Ghana: An Assessment of the Drivers for Some Electrical Appliances. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 12, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100171
  19. Leslie, G. W., Pourkhanali, A., & Roger, G. (2022). Electricity Consumption, Ethnic Origin and Religion. Energy Economics, 114, 106249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106249
  20. Lu, X., & White, H. (2014). Robustness Checks and Robustness tests in Applied Economics. Journal of Econometrics, 178(1), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016
  21. Martin, D. (1993). A General Theory of Secularization. Gregg Revivals Publisher.
  22. Minton, E., Xie, J., Gurel-Atay, E., & Kahle, L. R. (2018). Greening Up Because of God: The Relations among Religion, Sustainable Consumption, and Subjective Well‐Being. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 655-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12449
  23. Najeeb, A., Sridharan, S., Rao, A. B., Agnihotri, S. B., & Mishra, V. (2024). Determinants of residential electricity consumption in South, East and South East Asia: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 198, 114400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114400
  24. Poddar, P., Pal, D., & Chatterjee, S. (2021). Moving Up the Energy Ladder: does Socio-religious Status Matter?. Population and Environment, 42(3), 325-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11111-020-00365-3
  25. Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. M., & Masud, M. A. K. (2021). The impact of Trade Openness on the Cost of Financial Intermediation and Bank Performance: Evidence from BRICS Countries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10), 3550-3587. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2021-0498
  26. Sena, B., Zaki, S. A., Rijal, H. B., Ardila-Rey, J. A., Yusoff, N. M., Yakub, F., Ridwan, M. K., & Muhammad-Sukki, F. (2021). Determinant Factors of Electricity Consumption for a Malaysian Household Based on a Field Survey. Sustainability, 13(2), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020818
  27. Tete, K. H. S., Soro, Y. M., Coulibaly, S. F. A., Jones, R. V., & Sidibé, S. D. S. (2024). Determinants of Urban Residential Electricity Consumption in Burkina Faso: A Study of Dwelling, Household, Socio-economic and Appliance-related Factors. Buildings, 14(3), 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030683
  28. Wu, D. M. (1973). Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances. Econometrica, 41(4), 733-750. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914093

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.