Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between poverty and environmental damage in Indonesia. This study consists time series data covering the period from 2000 to 2023, and utilized the vector error correction model. The short-run findings reveal that economic inequality exacerbates CO2 emissions, as affluent groups exploit resources and disadvantaged community resort to unsustainable practices. This is compounded by political and economic power weakening environmental regulations. Conversely, CO2 emissions exacerbate poverty, especially in rural areas reliant on natural resources, making them vulnerable to environmental shocks. A strong positive correlation exists between ecological footprint per capita and CO2 emissions, driven by resource consumption and fossil fuel reliance, though renewable energy adoption shows promise in mitigating emissions. In the long run, our findings align with the Environmental Kuznets Curve theory, suggesting that economic growth, supported by clean energy and sound environmental policies, ultimately leads to reduced environmental impact. These findings underscore the critical need for balanced strategies that simultaneously address poverty alleviation and promote ecological sustainability through inclusive policies and a transition to renewable energy.

Keywords

Poverty Environmental damage Sustainable economic

Article Details

How to Cite
Wahyudi, S. T., Badriyah, N., Nabella, R. S., Sari, K., & Rahmawati, A. (2025). The Relationship between Poverty and Environmental Damage in Indonesia: A VECM Analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 23(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v23i1.23254

References

  1. Acheampong, A. O., Adams, S., & Boateng, E. (2019). Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Science of the Total Environment, 677, 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.384
  2. Akmalia, H. A. (2022). The impact of climate change on agriculture in Indonesia and its strategies: A systematic review. AGRITEPA: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Pertanian, 9(1), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.37676/agritepa.v9i1.1691
  3. Akpan, U. S., Isihak, S. R., & Asongu, S. A. (2019). Determinants of environmental degradation in Africa: Assessing the roles of income, institutional quality and social inequality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(29), 30075–30088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06195-3
  4. Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., & Raza, S. A. (2018). Does renewable energy consumption and health expenditures decrease carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Renewable Energy, 127, 1011-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.043
  5. Awolusi, O. D. (2021). Economic Growth and Socioeconomic Sustainability in BRICS Countries: A Vector Error Correction Modeling Approach. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 13(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v13i3(J).3122
  6. Indonesian Statistics. (2023). Indonesian Environmental Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id
  7. Bappenas. (2010). Rencana Aksi Nasional Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (RAN-PK) 2010-2014. Jakarta: Bappenas.
  8. Barbier, E. B. (2010). Poverty, development, and environment. Environment and Development Economics, 15(6), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1000032X
  9. Casillas, C. E., & Kammen, D. M. (2010). The energy-poverty-climate nexus. Science, 330(6008), 1181-1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197412
  10. Dinga, G. D. (2023). The ecological poverty trap: Addressing the role of structural change, economic growth, trade, capital formation and democracy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18, 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100245
  11. Dioikitopoulus, E.V., Ghosh, S., Karydas, C., & Vella, E. (2020). Roads to prosperity without environmental poverty: The role of impatience. Economics Letters, 186, 108781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108870
  12. Dhrifi, A., et al. (2020). Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.008
  13. Duraiappah, A.K. (1998). Poverty and environmental degradation: A review and analysis of the nexus. World Development, 26(12), 2169-2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305750X(98)00100-4
  14. Gütschow, J., Jeffery, M. L., Gieseke, R., Gebel, R., Stevens, D., Krapp, M., & Rocha, M. (2019). The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series, Earth System Science Data, 8, 571–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-571-2016
  15. Jin, G., Deng, X., Zhao, X., Guo, B., & Yang, J. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28, 1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1545-2
  16. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Angka deforestasi Indonesia turun menjadi 440.000 hektare. Retrieved from https://www.menlhk.go.id
  17. Koondhar, M. A., Aziz, N., Tan, Z., Yang, S., Abbasi, K. R., & Kong, R. (2021). Green growth of cereal food production under the constraints of agricultural carbon emissions: A new insights from ARDL and VECM models. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101452
  18. Langnel, Z., Amegavi, G. B., Donkor, P., & Mensah, J. K. (2021). Income inequality, human capital, natural resource abundance, and ecological footprint in ECOWAS member countries. Resources Policy, 74, 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102255
  19. Majeed, M. T., Tauqir, A., Mazhar, M., & Samreen, I. (2021). Asymmetric effects of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: New evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 329, 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13130-2
  20. Mojanoski, G. (2022). Long-run and short-run causality between stock price indices and macroeconomic variables: Evidence of panel VECM analysis from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia and Serbia. Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, 20(2), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.51558/2303-680X.2022.20.2.3%0A
  21. Masron, T. A., & Subramaniam, Y. (2019). Does poverty cause environmental degradation? Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Poverty, 23(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10875549.2018.1500969
  22. Meng, L. (2013). Evaluating China’s poverty alleviation program: A regression discontinuity approach. Journal of Public Economics, 101, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.02. 004
  23. Monyei, C. G., Adewumi, A. O., & Jenkins, K. E. H. (2018). Energy (in) justice in off-grid rural electrification policy: South Africa in focus. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.002
  24. Moran, D. D., Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J. A., Goldfinger, S. H., & Boutaud, A. (2008). Measuring sustainable development—Nation by nation. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 470-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.017
  25. Nurrachmi, et al. (2024). The nexus between income inequality and environmental degradation in ASEAN-6 countries during 1992–2015 from an Islamic perspective. Al-Muzara'ah, 12(1), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.12.1.159-175
  26. Pujiati, A., Nurbaeti, T., & Damayanti, N. (2022). What are the factors that determine differing levels of environmental quality? Evidence from Java and other islands in Indonesia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(4), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2022-0034
  27. Lange, G. M., et al. (2018). Do mature economies grow exponentially? Ecological Economics, 147, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.011
  28. Langnel, Z., Amegavi, G. B., Donkor, P., & Mensah, J. K. (2021). Income inequality, human capital, natural resource abundance, and ecological footprint in ECOWAS member countries. Resources Policy, 74, 22-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102255
  29. Li, H., & Zhou, L. A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
  30. Rajbhandari, S., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2021). Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation pathways for Thailand towards achievement of the 2 C and 1.5 C Paris Agreement targets. Climate Policy, 21(4), 492-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1857218
  31. Salari, et al. (2021). The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020. 12.007
  32. Saragi, N., Faqih, M. I., & Setiawan, B. (2021). The impact of energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Indonesia: An econometric approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111469.
  33. Shuai, J., Cheng, X., Tao, X., Shuai, C., & Wang, B. (2019). A theoretical framework for understanding the spatial coupling between poverty and the environment: A case study from China. Agronomy Journal, 111(3), 1097-1108. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.10.0681
  34. Sinha, P., Shahbaz, M., & Balsalobre, D. (2017). Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 1217-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071
  35. Ulucak, R., & Apergis, N. (2018). Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 80, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017. 11.002
  36. Wagle, U. R., Koo, J., & Kolb, D. (2016). Socioeconomic characteristics, environmental degradation and livelihood strategies of artisanal mining communities: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(6), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1140233
  37. Yang, Y., Xia, S., Huang, P., & Qian, J. (2024). Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms, and effects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101320
  38. Yilanci, V., et al. (2019). Are shocks to ecological footprint in OECD countries permanent or temporary? Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2018.11.299
  39. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519769
  40. Zafar, M., Sabir, S. A., Manzoor, S., Isran, M. A., & Kousar, S. (2021). An application of VECM to investigate the role of socio-economic factors in poverty: new evidence from Pakistan. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i2.3797
  41. Zhu, J., Liu, S., & Li, Y. (2021). Removing the “Hats of Poverty”: Effects of ending the national poverty county program on fiscal expenditures. China Economic Review, 69, 101673. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.chieco.2021.101673

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.