Main Article Content

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify and analyze the basic/leading sectors that have competitive advantages in each province, and to determine the regional typology and basic-sector priorities for regional development. The data used in this study were times series data in the period of 2010-2014. The data were analyzed by using LQ analysis, shift share, and Klassen typology. The result of this study indicated that each province had its own potentials in accordance with its conditions. The agricultural sector was the dominant basic sector in southern Sumatra for the five provinces had this basic sector; while other sectors varied by province. Only the Province of Bengkulu had company services and educational services; besides, Bengkulu had the most basic sectors (9 basic sectors), namely agricultural sector with LQ value of (2.34), water supply (3.14), trade (1.02), transport (2.06), real estate (1.47), company services (1.39), administration (2.29), educational services (2.01), and health services (1.40). The Province of Jambi was included in the fast-forward and fast-growing regional typology. Then, South Sumatra, Bengkulu, Lampung and Bangka Belitung were in the fast-growing regional typology. Based on the research results, there should be government intervention in developing potential sectors to become leading sectors in the regions and in enhancing the economic growth and competitiveness of the regions in southern Sumatra

Keywords

Gross Regional Domestic Product Location Quotient Analysis Klassen Typology Shift Share

Article Details

How to Cite
Ayu Monica, C., Marwa, T., & Yulianita, A. (2019). Analisis potensi daerah sebagai upaya meningkatkan perekonomian daerah di Sumatera Bagian Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 15(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v15i1.8825

References

  1. Arsyad, A. (2002). Media Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  2. Basuki, Agus Tri. (2009). Analisis Potensi Unggulan Kabupaten Kepulauan Yapen dalam Menopang Pembangunan Provinsi Papua Tahun 2004-2008. UNISIA, Vol 32(71), 5-19.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2013). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2013). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Lampung. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2013). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Jambi. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2013). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Bangka Belitung. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2013). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Bengkulu. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik
  8. Bai, Chong-En and Pan, Wenqing. (2012). Spatial Spillover and Regional Economic Growth in China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 982-990
  9. Fafurida. (2009) Perencanaan Pengembangan Sektor Pertanian Sub Sektor Tanaman Pangan di Kabupaten Kulonprogo. JEJAK, 2(2), 144- 155.
  10. Heralt, Janaranjana, Gebremedhin, Tesfa. & M, Mumbe, Blessing. (2011) A Dynamic Shift Share Analysis of Economic Growth in West Virginia. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 6(2), 155-169.
  11. Husna, Nailatul. Noor, I. Rozikin, M. (2012). Analisis Pengembangan Potensi Ekonomi Lokal untuk Menguatkan Daya Saing Daerah di Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 1(1), 188-196
  12. Ivanov, Stanislav and Craig Webster. (2010). Decomposition of Economic Growth in Bulgaria by Industry. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(2), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1108/014435810 11043609
  13. Kusdiana, Didik dan Candra Wulan. (2007). Analisis Daya Saing Ekspor Sektor Unggulan di Jawa Barat. Junal Trikonomika Fakultas Ekonomi UNPAS, 6(1).
  14. Marwa, Taufiq & Saleh, S. (2002). Potensi Relatif Sektor-sektor Ekonomi Propinsi Sumatera Selatan. Kajian Ekonomi 1 (1), 1-13.
  15. Mondal I, Wali. (2009). An Analysis of the Industrial Development Potential of Malaysia: A Shift Share Approach. The Clute Institute, 7(5), 41-46.
  16. Siregar, N Chairil. (2010). Analisis Potensi Daerah Pulau-Pulau Terpencil dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Ketahanan, Keamanan Nasional, dan Keutuhan Wilayah NKRI di Nunukan-Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 7(13), 345-368.
  17. Sutikno. & Maryunani. (2007). Analisis Potensi dan Daya Saing Kecamatan Sebagai Pusat Pertumbuhan Satuan Wilayah Pengembangan (SWP) Kabupaten Malang. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 1(1), 1-17
  18. Yolamalinda. (2014). Analisis Ekonomi Potensi Daerah Dalam Pengembangan Komoditi Unggulan Kabupaten Agam. ECONOMICA: Journal of Economic and Economic Education, 3(1), 27-41.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.